Here’s a bold statement: The Pittsburgh Steelers’ recent loss to the Cleveland Browns has sparked a debate that’s as fiery as it is fascinating. Did the Steelers prioritize preventing Myles Garrett from breaking the NFL sack record over securing their own playoff berth? It’s a question that’s dividing fans and analysts alike, and the implications are as intriguing as they are controversial. But here’s where it gets even more interesting: Steelers head coach Mike Tomlin insists his team wasn’t playing to stop Garrett from making history—they were simply sticking to their game plan. Let’s dive into the details and unpack what really happened on that fateful Sunday afternoon.
The Steelers’ performance against the Browns was, to put it mildly, underwhelming. Despite the stakes—a chance to clinch their division and secure a playoff spot—they failed to score a single touchdown. Meanwhile, a vocal subset of fans (as seen on platforms like X, formerly Twitter) speculated that the team seemed more focused on preventing Cleveland’s star edge rusher, Myles Garrett, from surpassing the single-season sack record of 22.5, currently held by both Michael Strahan and Pittsburgh’s own T.J. Watt. But is this a case of protecting legacy over pursuing victory? It’s a provocative idea, and one that Tomlin firmly denies.
In his post-game remarks, Tomlin was unequivocal: “We didn’t do anything against Myles that we don’t normally do against Myles. The sack record is irrelevant. We’ve got to minimize him if we want to secure a win. We did the same thing when we played them in Week 6, and he didn’t have any sacks then either. This wasn’t about the record—it’s just standard operating procedure when you face him.” Tomlin’s stance is clear, but it doesn’t stop the whispers. After all, Garrett himself claimed weeks ago that Steelers players are instructed to take penalties if he gets close to a sack—a statement that, while unverified, adds fuel to the fire.
And this is the part most people miss: Garrett’s sackless performance against the Steelers isn’t new. In Week 6, when Pittsburgh beat Cleveland, he was equally ineffective. So, was Sunday’s loss simply a matter of the Steelers failing to execute, rather than shifting their focus? Tomlin seems to think so. “I didn’t think we played poorly,” he said. “We just didn’t make enough plays. The Browns played well, and the game unfolded as expected, but we never made that signature play to get us over the hump.”
Now, the Steelers face a must-win scenario in Week 18 against the Ravens to keep their postseason dreams alive. Meanwhile, Garrett is just half a sack away from tying the record and a full sack away from setting a new benchmark—a feat he could achieve in the Browns’ finale against the Bengals. Will Pittsburgh’s loss be Cleveland’s gain? It’s a scenario that could make next weekend either a celebration or a somber reflection for Steelers fans.
But let’s circle back to the controversy: Were the Steelers too focused on preserving their players’ place in history? Or was their loss simply a result of execution issues? Tomlin’s denial is convincing, but it doesn’t silence the debate. What do you think? Is there merit to the idea that the Steelers were playing not to lose a record rather than to win a game? Let us know in the comments—this is one discussion you won’t want to miss.
For more NFL insights and analysis, subscribe to the SI BTN Newsletter and start your day with SI:CYMI. The drama is far from over, and the stakes have never been higher.
