Heartbreak in Manhattan? Kansas State Wildcats face a pivotal decision that could leave fans stunned: Will they even play in a bowl game this year? The shocking retirement announcement of head coach Chris Klieman has thrown a major wrench into what was once a celebratory postseason opportunity.
Just days ago, Wildcat Nation was buzzing about potential bowl destinations. Now, athletic director Gene Taylor has revealed a surprising possibility: the team might decline a bowl invitation altogether. But here's where it gets controversial... the ultimate decision rests not with the administration, but with the players themselves.
Taylor emphasized that he will prioritize the players' desires. "We will start with the players,” Taylor stated. “If they have a desire to play then we will take the next step. We have to start with the players and kind of see where they are at with it.” A team vote is planned to gauge the overall sentiment regarding participation.
Previously, the expectation was a resounding 'yes' to a bowl game. The Independence Bowl in Shreveport, Louisiana, on December 30th was considered a strong possibility. Other potential destinations like the Liberty Bowl and the Rate Bowl were also in the mix. Imagine the excitement building for K-State to showcase their skills on a national stage!
The initial enthusiasm stemmed from securing bowl eligibility with a 6-6 record after a victory against the Colorado Buffaloes. Senior players expressed their eagerness to play one last game together. But and this is the part most people miss... that was before the unexpected leadership change. Klieman's departure undoubtedly casts a shadow, potentially altering the players' motivations.
While Klieman could coach the team in a bowl game, Taylor also mentioned the possibility of offensive coordinator Matt Wells or defensive coordinator Joe Klanderman stepping in to lead the team. Who takes the reins could heavily influence the team’s performance and morale.
"We haven’t gotten that far,” Taylor explained, emphasizing the immediate focus on player input. “(Klieman) really wants me to talk to the players first to see what their interest is. And I’ll do that. Let’s get with the leadership and see where they are from a bowl perspective.” This approach underscores K-State's commitment to prioritizing the players' well-being and respecting their agency in this difficult situation.
But the big question is: what happens if the players are divided? A narrow vote could lead to further division within the team. A decision to decline a bowl bid would be a rare and potentially unpopular move, depriving fans of one last opportunity to cheer on the Wildcats this season.
What do you think K-State should do? Should they play in a bowl game as a final send-off to the seniors, even with the coaching change? Or is it better to decline, allowing the team to regroup and focus on the future under new leadership? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below!
